Study shows importance of tailoring treatments to clearly defined weed control objectives
Do you want a quick, short-term reduction in a weed population or long-term control? Is your weed problem limited to a specific area, or are you also concerned about adjacent fields?
“Answering such questions can help you select the most appropriate management options and eliminate wasted effort,” says Katriona Shea, a researcher at Pennsylvania State University.
To illustrate the importance of upfront decisions, researchers conducted a two-year study involving invasive thistle, a weed often found in pasturelands and rangelands. Mathematical models were used to determine which of 14 mowing strategies would best support each of three different management objectives: reducing the density of an existing thistle infestation, decreasing long-term population growth and limiting the weed’s spread.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, researchers found that fewer, well-timed mowing events were more effective than mowing as often as possible — making it possible to produce a better outcome with less effort.
Intense mowing both before flowering and during the peak flowering period, for example, produced the best long-term control of invasive thistle and reduced both its abundance and its spatial spread. A single, intense mowing during the peak flowering period was the most effective approach for short-term management, which is good news for land managers with limited time and resources.